What a family office actually does

The term is used loosely and understood narrowly. Most of the value lies in keeping records, calendars and advisers in order, and has little to do with picking investments.

Most descriptions of a family office begin and end with investments. In practice, investment management is the smallest and most easily outsourced part of the function. What distinguishes a family office is that someone is accountable for the whole picture—and for the unglamorous work of keeping it accurate.

It starts with one statement

The first deliverable in almost every family office engagement is a single document showing everything the family owns and owes: operating company, holding company, trusts, real estate, private positions, public portfolios, insurance, and liabilities. Families are often surprised by how long this takes to assemble the first time, and by what it reveals—a dormant entity, an account nobody had reviewed in years, a guarantee still outstanding.

Until that statement exists, every other decision is being made on partial information. Allocation cannot be assessed, because no one knows the true exposure. Liquidity cannot be planned, because commitments live in different places. Estate planning proceeds on assumptions about ownership that may no longer hold.

Then the calendar

The second function is keeping track of dates. Wealth of any complexity generates a stream of obligations: tax instalments, trust distributions, capital calls, insurance renewals, filing deadlines, the twenty-one-year rule quietly approaching on a family trust. In most families these are tracked by one person, in memory or in a spreadsheet, and the system works right up until it does not.

A family office turns that into a forward calendar with owners and reminders. It is administrative work of the least interesting kind, and missing one item can be expensive.

Then coordination

Most families of means already have good advisers: an accountant, a lawyer, perhaps an insurance specialist and one or more portfolio managers. What they typically lack is someone whose job is to make those advisers work from the same set of facts.

Left uncoordinated, professionals optimize their own slice. The tax structure is efficient but illiquid. The estate plan is elegant but contradicts the shareholders’ agreement. The portfolio is well diversified in isolation and heavily concentrated once the operating business is counted. Each adviser may be right within their own brief, with no one responsible for the whole.

And finally, the family itself

The last function is the one families postpone: convening the family. Meetings with an agenda and a record. A short written statement of what the family wants its money to do. A plan for how the next generation learns what it will one day be responsible for. The benefit shows at the next transition.

Do you need to build one?

A dedicated single-family office carries real fixed costs—staff, systems, premises, oversight—which only make sense at considerable scale and complexity. For most families, the sensible answer is to obtain the function as a service: the consolidated reporting, the calendar, the coordination, and the family governance, without the overhead of a dedicated office.

A useful test is whether anyone can currently answer, without a week of phone calls, what the family owns, what it owes, and what is due next.

This article is general information, not investment, tax, or legal advice, and does not describe client work. It does not take account of your circumstances. Please consult qualified professionals before acting.

Continue reading